![]()
If you are running any version of MacOS before Big Sur, avoid it at all costs if you're running Bug Sur, sadly you're stuck with it. ![]() This does all of the same stuff, but the glitches reduce productivity. Basically, the previous generation of this program worked much better. Stealing focus across multiple screens, so that all windows activate, rather than simply the screen that you're working in, meaning that anything running on the native computer gets bumped off of the screen until you minimise windows. There are too many OS glitches, with the menu bar randomly disappearing from the top of the screen, pointer and screen items misaligning semi-regularly as the window jumps into a slightly incorrect postiion on the screen, but the pointer remains correctly orientated so that they are a few pixels out with each other. ![]() Microsoft remote destkop on mac do not ask again for this connection upgrade#If you are on Catalina, do not upgrade to this. The main difference between remote desktop and remote assistance mode is that the session is started from the other side, you can't startģ) Remote assistance mode contains a built-in mechanism to get through NAT routers, seeĭisclaimer: I haven't tried it yet (Teredo never, and remote assistance just once in XP).The latest version is not nearly as stable as the now-superseded earlier versions, which will not work with MacOS Big Sur. There's remote assistance mode (which also uses the RDP protocol, just like RDC), where you both see the screenĪnd can use keyboard and mouse at the same time. Sorry if this sounds a bit vague, but the exact details depend on the brand/model of router you use.ġ) I would strongly recommend against opening the RDP port (and VNC just as well) "naked" on the internet, go for a VPN solution and connect through a tunnel.Ģ) It isn't necessarily so with RDC that the other user can't see what happens on the screen. You can route a port to only one machine, but you can route different ports to different machines - and 3389 is the default for RDP, but you can make machines connect on other ports. I've RDPed to multiple machines after the same router as well (an internal NAT router in the company LAN, not on the internet - there's that remark again ) You can use RDC through NAT routers if you open port 3389 on the router and forward it to the proper machine. ![]() Microsoft remote destkop on mac do not ask again for this connection pro#Today I only keep it aroundįor some old Win2000 Pro machines I still have to administer. For User Account, click the dropdown to change the setting. For PC Name, enter the name of the remote computer to connect to. Open the Microsoft Remote Desktop application. Microsoft remote destkop on mac do not ask again for this connection mac os x#I started building it down when W2K server came with a remote administration mode, because RDP is way more efficient with bandwidth. Mac OS X Remote Desktop Connection Instructions. Unsurprisingly, Microsoft Remote Desktop is mainly designed for Windows users and has various problems on Mac although admittedly is has improved in recent versions. Microsoft remote destkop on mac do not ask again for this connection for mac#However, neither are the best remote desktop software for Mac users. I've been a VNC addict too, way back in NT4. The most well known remote desktop tools on Windows are Microsoft Remote Desktop and Citrix Receiver. If you have any info websites you could point me to, I'd appreciate it. Microsoft remote destkop on mac do not ask again for this connection how to#I'll look up someĪdditional info on RDC and how to get it to work properly. I've also got Hamachi running too on everyone's machine. I think my problem now is that I have tried RDC, but cannot get it to work since all of us are in separate locations behind Thanks for the explanation, I think I may prefer to use RDC in certain instances. *** Email address is removed for privacy *** wrote: If there is such a problem, it must be dealt with promptly. There is something besides an issue with VNC causing the privilege elevation issue. But I think you should test RDP from a local point first to find out for certain whether or not > Luc is especially correct in saying that a VPN solution is going to be safer than simply forwarding ports. > participation can be useful in a remote session - just never in the particular case of the system I admin currently. That was just my admin paranoia creeping in there. > I wasn't thinking about Remote Assistance because I was reacting to Don's expressed concern about users seeing what he was doing and (potentially) having to be prompted and given an admin password. > I agree strongly with everything Luc has said. > Thanks again for the lively discussion. So I'm looking into trying to use Hamachi as a VPN and ![]() There are indeed times when I don't care to have the other person know or see what I'm doing, but in other cases, I need to show Thanks LeftFoot and Luc, both of you have given me lot's to think about. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |